[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Threads !!
- From: Ward William E PHDN <wardwe nswcphdn navy mil>
- To: "'redhat-list redhat com'" <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: Threads !!
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:49:02 -0500
Dave,
It sounds like you are asking about processor affinity.... yes, that's
been around for a while, but I'm not sure about specific libraries, the
solutions I've seen were all from commercial products and may have
been proprietary, ie., owned by Sybase, owned by Informix, etc.
Bill Ward
-----Original Message-----
From: ignatz dminet com [mailto:ignatz dminet com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 8:33 PM
To: redhat-list redhat com
Cc: recipient.list.not.shown; @nswcphdn.navy.mil
Subject: Re: Threads !!
<snip>
I don't know if anyone has done anything cool with SMP, in Linux or any
other Unix, to allow a library routine (or, by extension, any function)
in user space to indicate either what processor it wants to use, or
that it can be assigned to a separate processor as a thread of
execution. I don't see it in the online docs, but I'm not in a
position right now to do a web search.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]