[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
LFS | Large File Support using 2.4.9 and glibc 2.1.3 under RH6.2
- From: "Abe Scwartz" <sloween hotmail com>
- To: zoot-list redhat com, redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: LFS | Large File Support using 2.4.9 and glibc 2.1.3 under RH6.2
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 02:01:52 +0000
I'm running glibc 2.1.3 w/ kernel 2.4.9 and would like to enabled Large File
Support. My glibc 2.1.3 was recompiled
from the 6.2 source RPM after the 2.4.9 kernel upgrade. From the this
[http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html] page reads
(and a few other posts I've read) that should be it. None of the articles
I've read mention using any special compile/include/make flags when
recompiling glibc. I've also upgraded to bash2.
o Should any special patches or flags be passed to glibc 2.1.3 when
recompiling after upgrading to kernel 2.4.9?
o Is there a simple way to test that LFS is indeed present in my new glibc
2.1.3 w/ kernel 2.4.9 combination? `dd if=/dev/zero of=test.file
count=4400000` consistently fails with "File size limit exceeded(core
dumped)", but I'm not certain this isn't due to a limitation of dd. I've
tried the ulimit-pam.d/sshd fix, but that doesn't appear to have any affect.
o I recompiled tar-1.13 from the gnu.org tgz hoping that this might shed
some light on what might be present LFS-wise.
[from `./configure`]
checking for CFLAGS value to request large file support...
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
checking for LDFLAGS value to request large file support...
checking for LIBS value to request large file support...
checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS... 64
checking for _LARGEFILE_SOURCE... no
checking for _LARGE_FILES... no
Should _LARGEFILE_SOURCE or _LARGE_FILES be automatically detected? I tried
#define'ing _LARGEFILE_SOURCE and _LARGE_FILES manually in tar's config.h,
but this didn't allow tar to create a file larger than 2GB.
Out of desperation, I also tried rebuilding glibc-2.1.3 using the SRPMS from
ftp://ftp.scyld.com/pub/lfs/SRPMS, but this didn't solve the problem using
either the tar or dd tests.
The only RPMs I've worked with so far have been glibc-2.1.3,
glibc-devel-2.1.3 and glibc-profile-2.1.3. I didn't notice any specific
mention of modifying libstdc++, so I left it as is.
I've also tried the tar and dd tests on both an ext2 and reiserfs 3.6
partitions, with no luck.
I'm missing a small piece of the puzzle. Answers or suggestions from those
who've succeeded in getting LFS working on a RH6.2 box with 2.4.x and glibc
2.1.3 would be greatly appreciated. I'm sure I'm missing something really
simple.
Thanks again!
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]