[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: wireless lan
- From: Cameron Simpson <cs zip com au>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: wireless lan
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:15:46 +1000
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 12:03:48AM -0400, Jason Costomiris <jcostom jasons org> wrote:
| On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:43:07PM -0700, Steve Lee wrote:
| : is it true to say that your connection is encrypted
| : only for ssh using wireless lan, and not for other
| : connection using a linksys wireless equipment?
| Depends. Are you using WEP? If so, all of your packets are encrypted,
| though I wouldn't call the crypto terribly strong, given the presence
| of such tools as airsnort.
Here (speaking as a sysadmin faced with user desires for wireless) we're
basicly taking the attitude that a wireless is an open channel, and thus
that all wireless stuff will be "outside" our firewall, topologically
speaking. If you want point to point security, use IPSec or ssh (myself,
I'd use both for no profoundly sane reason).
BTW, anyone know if there's a variant on an MX record to say "deliver
using SSL"?
--
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 cs zip com au http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/
I die. O my hair falls out and my flesh rots and my bones are cracked by the
hungry ta!a'an. He drops me behind him all around the forest and nothing will
grow where his excrement from my marrow falls. As the years pass the forest
dies from the poison of my remains. The soil washes into the sea and poisons
the fish, and all die. O the embarrassment. - Joe Haldeman, _A !Tangled Web_
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]