[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: glibc-2.2 RPM versus glibc-2.1.92-14, please Help !
- From: Bret Hughes <bhughes elevating com>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: glibc-2.2 RPM versus glibc-2.1.92-14, please Help !
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:32:09 -0600
Michael George wrote:
> >
> > It's very strange! When i use the command rpm -q
> > glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM to see if its really installed,
> > the message say NO.
>
> That's because the package is "glibc" not "glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM". The *file*
> is "glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM", the *package* is "glibc". I used to make this
> mistake, too. Especially when I use file-completion with the "rpm -q"
> command...
yep.
rpm -qa|grep glibc
or whatever is your friend
The package names sometimes include version information. It can be very
confusing.
Another of my old favorites is rpm -qa|sort |less for an alphabetical listing of
all the packages installed.
HTH
Bret
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]