Re: Linux only sees 64M RAM

[ABrady <kcsmart kc rr com>]

On Wed, 16 May 2001 16:06:20 -0500 "Jason P. Holland"
<jphollan earthlink net> spake unto us:

> > 
> > perhaps that's what caused the kernel panic. Maybe it's only 
> > a requirement
> > when using "M" instead of "K"? All I know is, on a Redhat 6.2 
> > system with an
> > unmodified kernel, using:
> > 
> >  append="mem=390M"
> > 
> > failed miserably (kernel panic)
> > 
> > however, using
> > 
> > append="mem=390000K"
> > 
> > worked just fine.
> > 
> > david
> > 
> 
> 390000/1024=380

And 390M*1024=399360K

What a difference a K makes!

-- 
Who are the Brain Police?