[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Explanation of Run-Levels?
- From: "Alan Mead" <amead8695 home com>
- To: <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Explanation of Run-Levels?
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:34:46 -0500
From: "Jon S. Jaques" <wayvirgo home com>
To: <redhat-list redhat com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: Explanation of Run-Levels?
> If I change from lv. 5 to 3, are all of the services associated with the
> higher levels nicely shutdown?
Try it and see.
> And I could maybe change to lvl. 2 (or 1 or 0?) to disconnect all users
and
> services so that I could run backups? Or maybe some other large task that
> can't be interrupted by connections, such as indexing large file systems
or
> something?
Switching to 0 shutsdown the machine IIRC. Switching to 6 reboots it.
Don't know what runlevel 2 does but look in /etc/rc.d/rc2.d and see what's
in there. The files are all symlinks to start up scripts in
/etc/rc.d/init.d . Many sources cover this (more comprehensively than
you're likely to get on a list) in the section where they talk about system
initialization.
> Would switching from a high, "normal" level, such as 5 or 6, to the lowest
> level, and then back again be essentially the same as a reboot?
Switching to 6 would reboot the machine. (IIRC). Red Hat uses 5 is the GUI
mode ... don't know what happens when you switch to that, I guess it starts
those services. But these numbers are nominal, not ordinal. There is no
reason why reboot isn't 1 and single user mode 2, etc. run level 3 isn't
more or less than 5 or 1. Just different.
-Alan
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]