[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
rpm - can I keep the old version?
- From: Bill Johnson <wejohnson usa net>
- To: <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: rpm - can I keep the old version?
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 22:46:49 -0400 (EDT)
I'll give some background... scroll down for my actual question. Thanks!
On a RH 7.1 system...
I'm trying to install latest version of KOffice, and getting dependency
problems (imagine that).
Specifically:
# rpm -Uvh koffice-1.1-2.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libcrypto.so.2 is needed by koffice-1.1-2
libfam.so.0 is needed by koffice-1.1-2
libkdeprint.so.0 is needed by koffice-1.1-2
libssl.so.2 is needed by koffice-1.1-2
So, I thought I'd fix that, so downloaded newer version of openssl and
tried:
# rpm -Uvh openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by bind-utils-9.1.0-10
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by slrn-0.9.6.4-2
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by cyrus-sasl-1.5.24-17
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by openldap-2.0.7-14
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by pine-4.33-8
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by sendmail-8.11.2-14
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by fetchmail-5.7.4-4
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by lynx-2.8.4-9
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by python-1.5.2-30
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by pidentd-3.0.12-4
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by ucd-snmp-4.2-12
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by ucd-snmp-utils-4.2-12
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by kdebase-2.1.1-8
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by kdelibs-2.1.2-1
libssl.so.1 is needed by slrn-0.9.6.4-2
libssl.so.1 is needed by openldap-2.0.7-14
libssl.so.1 is needed by pine-4.33-8
libssl.so.1 is needed by sendmail-8.11.2-14
libssl.so.1 is needed by fetchmail-5.7.4-4
libssl.so.1 is needed by lynx-2.8.4-9
libssl.so.1 is needed by python-1.5.2-30
libssl.so.1 is needed by kdebase-2.1.1-8
libssl.so.1 is needed by kdelibs-2.1.2-1
Obviously, I still need the older version of these libs out there for the
above software packages.
So, I got brave (or stupid) and tried to keep both versions of the libs
out there by:
# rpm -i openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm
file /usr/bin/openssl from install of openssl-0.9.6b-6 conflicts with
file from package openssl-0.9.6-3
file /usr/share/ssl/openssl.cnf from install of openssl-0.9.6b-6 conflicts
with file from package openssl-0.9.6-3
MY QUESTION - Since I use so many of the above apps which rely on the old
version of the libs, can I do what I tried in the above step (i.e. install
rather than upgrade), and use the --force? Is this wise? If this is not
the solution, what is?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Bill
--
William E. Johnson
_____________________________
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but
that they know so much that ain't so."
-- Josh Billings, 1818-1885.
"The greatest proof of Christianity for others is not how
far a man can logically analyze his reasons for believing, but
how far in practice he will stake his life on his belief."
-- T. S. Eliot (1888-1965)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]