[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Starting w3m: error
- From: Meph Istopheles <meph Aeon-AL Com>
- To: <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Starting w3m: error
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
> ... ummh, if I want to see the beautiful ladies on the net I
> still use Netscape (and hoping the Taliban from whereever they
> live do not read this mail :)), just going away and making a
> cup of coffee while the browser's loading the page (OK, this
> was a joke ... )
For that matter, w3m lets you set any graphics app you have
installed to let you see ~any~ pic on a page -- naked or
otherwise;-). It can be a drag to have to click the image & hit
Sh-I, but it's a damn site faster than NS.
> seriously: for pages where I do not need to see pictures I
> mostly use lynx, links or w3m:
I've not used links, but have used lynx throughout the years
either through telnet or before having w3m installed on a box
without X. But I much prefer w3m. I use it daily & far more
often than any of the gui browsers I have installed.
> By the way, for the folks using the Junkbuster Proxy with their
> browser: it didn't work with w3m with localhost:8000 on my
> machine, instead I had to write http://localhost:8000/
Can't imagine junkbuster would really be necessary with w3m,
but I suppose there's much more to it than I know, as I've never
really used it. How does it render w3m pages differently than
without it?
Meph
--
"I did this 'cause Linux gives me a woody."
-Dave '-ddt->' Taylor, announcing DOOM for Linux
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]