RE: Advanced Server - Oracle 9i install issues

["Jim Purtell" <JPurtell henkels com>]

Thanks Robert.
We'll give this a try.
And just foe future reference. . Dell cert'ed this box for RH-AS. Oracle
is, I believe, on board with this as well. At this point we're on a
severity 1 status at Oracle. We'll see when and if they come up with a
solution.
In the mean time we'll try you suggestion.

I'll keep the mailing-list posted.

thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Monical [mailto:tech restek com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:27 PM
To: redhat-list redhat com
Subject: Re: Advanced Server - Oracle 9i install issues


Sorry about the last.

Looks like this is a not a "certified" configuration

Here is what Orale sez about 7.1............  I have not tried this
install yet

APPENDIX A - Solutions for the relinking problem seen with Oracle 9.0.1
on 
Red Hat 7.1.
Option 1: (remove "-z defs" from genclntsh file) (Workaround)
1. When you get errors from OUI installer, open a window, and cd to the
Oracle Home installation target location
2. Set Oracle environment ORACLE_HOME to this target directory.
3. Use editor to modify $ORACLE_HOME/bin/genclntsh file, to remove -z
defs 
from it.
4. Then run this script $ORACLE_HOME/bin/genclntsh to create Oracle
libraries.
5. Go back to OUI error window, and click on retry bottom to continue.
Option 2: (update the binutils) You have to follow these steps to solve
the 
re-linking problem:
1. Update the binutils-2.10.91.0.2-3 to binutils-2.10.91.0.4-1 2.
You can get the binutils patch at the following URL:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/bin
utils-2.10.91.0.4-1.i386.rpm 

3. Relink Oracle binaries.



At 05:26 PM 8/29/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Has anyone had any issues with installing Oracle 9i on an Advanced
Server?
>We currently have RH-AS 2.1 loaded on a Dell 6650 with 12 GB of mem.
and 4 
>X 1.6 GB Xeons.
>
>Oracle 9.0.1 R2 stalls on Linking. It gets as far as 61% then begins to

>eat up cpu time and hangs the box.
>We successfully installed the same media (RH-AS & Oracle 9i) on a Dell 
>2400 with no issues.
>I guess my question is, what could be so different that Oracle wont 
>install on our 6650 but will on our 2400???
>
>Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
>
>
>Jim Purtell<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = 
>"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
>Systems Administrator
>Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
>Office: 215-283-8016
>Fax: 215-283-7702
>
>
>
>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request redhat com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list