[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: CDROM CDRW Not Accessible
- From: Alan Harding <alanh flashmail com>
- To: Redhat List <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: CDROM CDRW Not Accessible
- Date: Thu Dec 26 04:30:01 2002
On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 02:57, Mike Burger wrote:
> If he's using the ide-scsi module, it would, without any help, set up both
> drives as scd0 and scd1...the cdrw, being the master, would no doubt be
> scd0, with the cdrom identified as scd1.
>
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wednesday 25 December 2002 03:57 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> > > He's already noted that he's put the CDRW as secondary master, and the
> > > CDROM as secondary slave. Those are, by definition, /dev/hdc
> > > and/dev/hdd, respectively.
> >
> > Unless he is using scsi emulation for the CDRW, that changes things. In
> > that case, there is no device at /dev/hdc.
> >
> > I have the same setup, cdrom as secondary slave, CDRW as secondary master.
> >
> > [mfratoni paradox mfratoni]$ grep cdrom /etc/fstab
> > /dev/cdrom1 /mnt/cdrom1 iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro,user,unhide 0 0
> > /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro,user,unhide 0 0
> >
> > $ ll /dev/cdrom /dev/cdrom1
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Jan 1 2002 /dev/cdrom -> /dev/hdd
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Oct 5 00:07 /dev/cdrom1 -> /dev/scd0
> >
> > The CDRW is probably accessable as /dev/scd0
> >
Maybe I shouldve been more clear, that was the reason I asked for the
dmesg output. Sorry, but it was Xmas day and i had been "getting into
the spirit" :)
I have a CD and and a CD-RW in my own machine here and the CDRW appears
as scd0. If this is the case then the mount coammand will fail
--
Alan & Jan Harding
Tel: 07715 539272
"One by one the penguins are stealing my sanity"
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]