[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [OT] Re: MS FUD
- From: Thomas Ribbrock <argathin gmx net>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [OT] Re: MS FUD
- Date: Wed May 1 07:30:32 2002
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:13:01PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> The problem does not arise with the *retail* copy of Windows, but does with
> the OEM version.
>
> Original Equipment Manufacturer versions are sold at a discount (we'll give
> you 20% off each license but you *MUST* sell a copy with every PC even if the
> customer does not want it)
>
> This license permits one instance to be installed on that PC. This instance
> is *tied* to that PC, and cannot be installed on another PC even if it's
> removed from the one it was bundled on.
Thanks for the clarification! IIRC, there was some court ruling that made
that practice illegal in either Germany and/or the EU. I might confuse
details here (I didn't follow it too closely...), but I do remember MS
wasn't happy...
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
...'cause only lusers quote signatures!
Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.ribbrock.org | ICQ#: 15839919
"You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]