[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: up2date.. inconsistentency ?
- From: ABrady <kcsmart kc rr com>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: up2date.. inconsistentency ?
- Date: Fri May 3 01:17:01 2002
On Thu, 02 May 2002 22:02:39 -0700
Harry Putnam <reader newsguy com> quietly intimated:
> ABrady <kcsmart kc rr com> writes:
>
> > At least it all worked out in the end.
>
> Just to make sure you understood, my last post was a thank you.
> Wasn't sure from your reply if you realized I was thanking you.
Yeah, I knew that. I so rarely have a lot of time any more, I took the
opportunity to let some wind flow. Actually I ended up writing something
altogether different than what I'd originally intended, so it wasn't
exactly a smooth flow of thoughts.
> There does need to be some more even handed way to handle that
> situation though. I appears a catch-22 especially to an unseasoned
> user.
That's definite. But it's not something that has happened often and
hopefully won't be repeated often either.
--
99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]