[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: PGP
- From: Tobias <tobias_r home se>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: PGP
- Date: Sat Nov 2 19:07:14 2002
Thanx!
But the fact that there are many diffrent versions of PGP bothers me. Why not
use the PGPi version? (www.pgpi.org)
Regards
Tobias
On Friday 01 November 2002 17:48, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01-Nov-2002/15:27 +0100, Tobias <tobias_r home se> wrote:
> >Ok, OpenPGP sounds like the way tyo go then.
> >But what protection does it offer? Is it the same as the Us. ver. that
> >was not to be let outside the US or is it like the Int. version?
>
> Go to GnuPG homepage <http://www.gnupg.org/> and read the FAQ.
>
> Tony
> - --
> Anthony E. Greene <mailto:agreene pobox com>
> OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
> AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05 HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
> Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D <agreene pobox com>
>
> iD8DBQE9wrBwpCpg3WyUI50RAp5dAKCArLRmUqqAIDyxKEFtkX+9xPMwFACdH3kD
> uijFzEihkwKOQjPCOJNLqUI=
> =mEEt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]