[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine
- From: Anand Buddhdev <arb anand org>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: red-carpet and up2date on same machine
- Date: Thu Feb 6 06:58:02 2003
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 06:37:50AM -0500, Kevin MacNeil wrote:
> > I must admit that for the last year or so I have been running
> > red-carpet and up2date.
> >
> > Red carpet is used for all my package updates, and it has never given
> > any problems.
> >
> > Up2date is run only to do kernel upgrades.
>
> I use red-carpet exclusively, although I manually install kernel, glibc
> and openssl updates because redhat releases i686 binaries for them. If
> up2date was smart enough to download the proper machine-specific
> binaries, that would definitely be a point in its favor. Other than
> that I prefer red-carpet because the downloads are so much faster.
Huh? Check again. Up2date *does* know about architectures, and will
install the correct i686 packages as needed.
I've just updated my kernel using up2date, and this is what I have:
$ rpm -q --queryformat "%{arch}\n" kernel
i686
--
Anand Buddhdev
http://anand.org
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]