[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: athlon xp vs. athlon mp (ot...kinda)
- From: "Benjamin R. Mohilef" <benm dsl-only net>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: athlon xp vs. athlon mp (ot...kinda)
- Date: Fri Feb 28 17:14:15 2003
> so now down to the question. whats the difference between a dual
> athlon xp system and a dual athlon mp system besides a >huge< price
> difference? the dual mp motherboards are twice as expensive...as are
> the athlon mp processors.
The mp has been configured by AMD to run in a multiprocessing
enviornment. That said, the newsgroups are full of both success
and failure stories of people trying to use XP's in multiprocessor
systems. There exists a trace on the XP's that only the brave cut
which enable the multiprocessor features. If you search the
newsgroups you will get a more detailed description of that
hardware hack, but from a reliability and cost-effectiveness position
I would never try it myself (we used to the call stuff like that the
"maximum smoke" method of engineering).
> also, how supported is this kinda stuff in the linux kernel in redhat
The Asus a7m266-d board runs two MP processors and does an
excellent job under both updated RH 8.0 and the current RH
RawHide release . I couldn't be happier with the systems.
Particularly glad that they recognize pci based hardware (for which
I am writing a driver) without coaxing. The Asus board is used quite
widely with the AMD mp processors because of the ease with which
Linux and even Win 2000 work with it.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]