[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: VPN opinions
- From: "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters NetHeaven com>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: VPN opinions
- Date: Thu Jan 30 17:39:03 2003
nate writes:
> also, depending on your needs, a full VPN may be overkill. Many remote
> server to server communications are usually about a specific service or
> services. In the case of a TCP service, e.g. mysql traffic, or LDAP
> traffic, I use stunnel to link machines. This is a simple point to
> point tunnel over SSL.
A problem that can arise when using stunnel for long-term tunnels is
that a single bad packet causes OpenSSL to return an error and stunnel
to drop the connection. We had a case where a stunnel tunnel across
a noisy link would not stay up more than a few minutes under load.
Switching to CIPE and later OpenVPN gave robust tunnels over the same
network path.
That said, I have a user who has been using a stunnel/PPP tunnel for
almost two years, and his tunnel stays up for weeks at a time.
--
Dick St.Peters, stpeters NetHeaven com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]