[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: How much swap space is needed
- From: Kent Borg <kentborg-rhl borg org>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: How much swap space is needed
- Date: Sun Jun 1 22:46:51 2003
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 07:51:06PM -0600, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> In your case... Id probably set it to 512, or 1024 depending on how
> much disk space you can spare.
I was thinking about this more this afternoon. I was imagining buying
a frugal but killer box. Say I picked up a parts catelogue with the
intention of spending some money wisely. What would I do?
I might buy this: their best dual CPU motherboard, a pair of the
fastest CPUs available (or second fastest?--sometimes the bleeding
edge costs too much for too little), as much RAM as it would accept
(say, 6 GB), a fast dual headed video card, 4 of those 300+ GB hard
drives arrayed in a software raid 0+1 giving me 600+ GB of fast disk
space. Obviously throw in heatsinks, a case, et al.
How much swap would I give that? It would depend upon what I was
doing.
If doing kernel compiles and general purpose web browsing I might give
it 2 GB--way less than my total RAM. OK, maybe 4 GB.
If I wanted to do video (or HDTV) production (Linux is finally getting
there) and rotoscoping (retouching) I would try it with no swap and
see how it worked. But say I wanted to start computing fancy 3-D
sequences, might big renderings want to work their way through big
datasets and benefit from a lot of swap? Or would this benefit not
kick in until we get to 64-bit CPUs and their bigger address space?
I am starting to think that a single gigabyte of swap is pretty well
sized to the current Linux kernels.
-kb
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]