Re: Why is RH9 slower than Windows98SE. Any advice?

[Cornelius Kölbel <cornelius koelbel gmx de>]

Hello,

wait till enlightenment is at version 3.0. Then this is slow too. :-( (i 
guess)

cornelius

Didier Casse wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Apollo (Carmel Entertainment) wrote:
>
>  
>
> > I am migrating my workstations to RH9 from WindowsME and 98SE.
> > So... I intalled RH9.0 and all the workstations are so much slower, all of the
> > stuff is so much slower. Workstations are mostly Dells with about 900Mhz or
> > higher, all with 300(-ish) Megs of RAM. System monitors are telling me that RAM
> > is filled about %95 and swap is filled %5. Any advice on how to make things run
> > a bit faster without hardware upgrades?
> >
> >    
>
> Use Enlightenment desktop (www.enlightenment.org) instead of KDE or GNOME. 
> The other desktops simply suck and I agree are slower than windows XP! 
>
>
>
>