[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: module-info?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:59:35 -0800 (PST), Todd A. Jacobs wrote:

> If it's module-related, then by definition it's kernel related. 

With the exception that tools like redhat-config-network or anaconda
use a customized copy of a module-info file.

> If nobody knows the answer, it's because it has zero impact on the
> majority of people. So again, rather than expecting people to be
> responsive about something that has no relevence to them, be proactive and
> scratch your own itch: contact kernel developers, search the source for
> references to modules-info, or experiment by moving the file and see what
> happens.

It is specific to Red Hat. It is not referenced by any of the kernel
source files. And external tools don't access the file in /boot
either and hence stop working if the file is deleted. And frankly, I
don't care whether the file is created manually, half-automatically
(module descriptions would match those found in the kernel source)
or automatically as long as tools come with a copy of that file that
differs.

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+YInw0iMVcrivHFQRAibjAJ9SmzEUSjruKaZLl3l7ZrLghv+VJgCeNgBG
7q6h0J0O/aaAI4n507OvZrg=
=wYvr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]