[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: module-info?
- From: Michael Schwendt <ms0301rh arcor de>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: module-info?
- Date: Sat Mar 1 05:25:15 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:59:35 -0800 (PST), Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> If it's module-related, then by definition it's kernel related.
With the exception that tools like redhat-config-network or anaconda
use a customized copy of a module-info file.
> If nobody knows the answer, it's because it has zero impact on the
> majority of people. So again, rather than expecting people to be
> responsive about something that has no relevence to them, be proactive and
> scratch your own itch: contact kernel developers, search the source for
> references to modules-info, or experiment by moving the file and see what
> happens.
It is specific to Red Hat. It is not referenced by any of the kernel
source files. And external tools don't access the file in /boot
either and hence stop working if the file is deleted. And frankly, I
don't care whether the file is created manually, half-automatically
(module descriptions would match those found in the kernel source)
or automatically as long as tools come with a copy of that file that
differs.
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+YInw0iMVcrivHFQRAibjAJ9SmzEUSjruKaZLl3l7ZrLghv+VJgCeNgBG
7q6h0J0O/aaAI4n507OvZrg=
=wYvr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]