[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rsync, leave files compressed?
- From: Michael Schwendt <ms0301rh arcor de>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: rsync, leave files compressed?
- Date: Mon Mar 31 12:03:03 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Mar 2003 16:07:53 +0100, gregory mott wrote:
> i have just discovered rsync (thanks to a redhat-list poster for
> pointing it out) and it is very good.. actually it is half of what i've
> been wanting.. the other half is (an option) to compress (preferably
> bzip2) each file on transmission (iff that results in a reduction in
> size) and store it still compressed (with appropriate name extension) on
> the other end. and of course vice versa.
>
> does this kind of capability already exist out there somewhere?
rsync option -z (or --compress) compresses data prior to sending
it to you.
> by the way, why is redhat dropping bzip2?
??
> and similarly, i wonder why afio, once offered on a redhat extra-tools
> cd, never landed in the rh distro nor seemingly caught much popularity
> otherwise? compressing a file at a time instead of the whole stream is
> definitely a better approach..
Can't say anything to afio, but compressing several files at once
often results in better total compression efficiency.
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+iHVK0iMVcrivHFQRAuqqAJ4i/ySJgAyyBiccO/NbM/SJMCjOHwCdEiCC
Qk2daXXgs0QpZTAazfpcYBw=
=MDLy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]