[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ClamAV or another?
- From: Gerry Doris <gdoris rogers com>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: ClamAV or another?
- Date: Mon Feb 2 18:41:04 2004
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 17:37, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 02:10:16PM -0800, Mike McMullen wrote:
> > From: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts ewilts org>
> > > I use f-prot at home. It's not open source, but is free for
> > > non-commercial use. I don't know if that's good enough for you. It's
> > > already caught over 600 copies of the MyDoom virus heading my way.
> > >
> > > .../Ed
> > > --
> > Hi Ed,
>
> > Well I have several email accounts on this system. Does it scan
> > incoming email at the inbound sendmail level or when a message is
> > downloaded to a mailbox via popd or imapd? I need something that
> > checks as the message is coming in.
>
> I use MailScanner which invokes f-prot. All my mail is scanned before
> it is delivered to any end user. You have a bunch of options if a
> message is infected, from dropping the mail in the bitbucket to
> automatically notifying the sender of the infection (a feature I hate
> since I get several of these per day from other sites that don't realize
> that the from address for the MyDoom worm is forged). I simply strip
> the virus, deliver the remaining pieces, and quarantine the infected
> hunks for subsequent purging (automatic) or inspection.
The newest version of MailScanner has the bounce function removed for
exactly the reason you specify. You can also use multiple virus
scanners. I personally use ClamAV and TrendMicro as well as F-Prot.
All are free for personal use. I believe that ClamAV was one of the
first to be updated to catch the MyDoom virus. It is open source and is
very good!
--
Gerry Doris <gdoris rogers com>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]