[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: About grep
- From: "Ben Yau" <byau cardcommerce com>
- To: <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: About grep
- Date: Mon Jan 12 13:29:03 2004
>
>
> That works but I generally prefer something more fun...
> find . -depth | xargs grep "string I am looking for"
>
> It seems to run a bit faster for me (Strange considering it is
> loading find,
> xargs and grep) and also, there are so many switches with find, you can do
> almost anything.
>
I also agree here.
In general, I would suggest "grep -r" for most sysadmins, esp. those not
comfortable yet with find.
For me personally, it's almost a habit to use find and I use it with most
everything (including in place of ls -R). Esp. since I think recursive grep
was not a feature when I first starting sysadmining.
I hardly use "grep -r" but I think it is an easier way to remember how to
grep recurisvely.
As for find, correct me if i'm wrong but -depth will list all file types in
your output right? (soft links, directories, etc.)
If this is not desired, admins/users may also want to consider
find . -type f | xargs grep "string"
Good post. I haven't done any speed tests before so I find your speed
results enlightening.
Ben Y
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]