[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: [redhat-lspp] TAHI test results on lspp 44 kernel
- From: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala TrustedCS com>
- To: Fernando T Medrano <ftmedran us ibm com>
- Cc: redhat-lspp redhat com
- Subject: RE: [redhat-lspp] TAHI test results on lspp 44 kernel
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:03:12 -0400
> There were corresponding avc messages in /var/log/messages, but would
> policy matter since I am running in permissive?
Policy shouldn't matter then.
> Also, if I run with
> NET_XFRM disabled I wont be able to run the IPSec tests, is
> that what you
> are suggesting?
I meant the labeled IPSec stuff introduced by the NETWORK_XFRM code.
If your tests don't use labeled IPSec then you should be able to run
without NETWORK_XFRM.
>
> I plan to run the tests against an upstream kernel to see if
> there are any
> discrepancies.
This might be a better plan (to begin with) than excluding NETWORK_XFRM
altogether.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]