[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [redhat-lspp] I am getting lots of push back on devallocator.
- From: Linda Knippers <linda knippers hp com>
- To: George Wilson <gcwilson us ibm com>
- Cc: redhat-lspp <redhat-lspp redhat com>, Klaus Weidner <klaus atsec com>, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [redhat-lspp] I am getting lots of push back on devallocator.
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:50:53 -0400
> Well, we were originally going to have the admin setup printers in
> advance. But that appeared to be too inflexible. However, you are
> right that user printer allocation appears to be more of a workstation
> feature for directly-attached printers than a server feature. So I
> agree that we should restrict print queue setup to admins. We may
> still want the device allocator for other purposes in the future.
> Let's please discuss this during the Monday meeting.
I think the device allocator is a good thing, its just a question of
whether it needs to be a trusted program or run by a trusted user.
-- ljk
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]