[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: Updated cups-lspp.patch
- From: Valdis Kletnieks vt edu
- To: Tim Waugh <twaugh redhat com>
- Cc: redhat-lspp redhat com, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>, Matt Anderson <mra hp com>
- Subject: Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: Updated cups-lspp.patch
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:37:35 -0400
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:23:50 BST, Tim Waugh said:
> Small thing: should the daemon be called just 'access', or would
> 'lspp-access' be better?
lspp-access, definitely. That way, if one of my not-so-LSPP-savvy co-workers
encounters it, they won't mistake it for that other daemon that's running
and providing accessibility functions for the disabled...
Attachment:
pgpCuqwkqmgQb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]