Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: Updated cups-lspp.patch

[Matt Anderson <mra hp com>]

Valdis Kletnieks vt edu wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:23:50 BST, Tim Waugh said:
>>Small thing: should the daemon be called just 'access', or would
>>'lspp-access' be better?
> 
> lspp-access, definitely.  That way, if one of my not-so-LSPP-savvy co-workers
> encounters it, they won't mistake it for that other daemon that's running
> and providing accessibility functions for the disabled...
> 

Just to clarify, that program is not a daemon.  It happens to live in
the directory /usr/lib/cups/daemon/ and is exec'ed by the cups daemon
when it needs to verify access is permitted to a given local printer.

I doubt that it would be confused for an accessibility program.  That
said, I have no problem with changing the name.

-matt