[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[redhat-lspp] RE: What is the preferred way of setting a machines maximum sensi tivity?
- From: Chad Hanson <chanson TrustedCS com>
- To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh redhat com>, Chad Hanson <chanson TrustedCS com>
- Cc: redhat-lspp <redhat-lspp redhat com>, Stephen Smalley <sds tycho nsa gov>
- Subject: [redhat-lspp] RE: What is the preferred way of setting a machines maximum sensi tivity?
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 16:32:25 -0400
> Maybe this is a future requirement, but when we move to
> destributing the seusers file, you
> could have a user be SystemLow-SystemHigh but a machine maxed out at
> TopSecret. We need to handle this.
The concept being required is creating a set of accredited labels.
The accreditation checks should be added into parts of the pam framework.
The reason I say parts is that, SystemLow & SystemHigh may not be accredited
but still used and valid for administration purposes.
A potential method for handling this could be the translation database. Only
pairings with names could deemed as accredited.
Just some thoughts....
-Chad
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]