Le ven 29/08/2003 à 16:58, Féliciano Matias a écrit : > Le ven 29/08/2003 à 16:26, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > > Felipe Alfaro Solana (felipe_alfaro linuxmail org) said: > > > up2date seems to ping-pong between packages rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 and > > > redhat-release-9.0.93-1. They obsolete each other so, if I up2date to > > > redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and then run up2date again, > > > redhat-release-9.0.93-1 is obsoleted by rawhide-release-9.0.93-2. If I > > > up2date, rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is installed, but running up2date > > > again says rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 is obsoleted by > > > redhat-release-9.0.93-1 and so on: > > > > rawhide release should not be in the channel, we'll try to get this > > loked at. > > > > rawhide-release-9.0.93... old the signature to sign packages : > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01351.html > > it is not the same package than rawhide-release-20030828... from rawhide > repository. > > rawhide-release-9.0.93-2 : > https://rhn.redhat.com/network/software/packages/file_list.pxt?pid=148419 > > This problem have been reported : > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01388.html Forget this! It's bad copy/paste. Sorry. > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01405.html > > > > Bill > > -- Féliciano Matias <feliciano matias free fr>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=