Le ven 29/08/2003 à 17:54, Jef Spaleta a écrit : > Féliciano Matias wrote: > >This problem have been reported : > >http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01388.html > >http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-beta-list/2003-August/msg01405.html > > A reminder....posting to the beta list is not reporting a bug. I understand. But where in bugzilla ? It's not an up2date or rawhide bug. It's only a rhn bug/mistake. My posts are replies to Elliot Lee who build the "severn update" channel. > This problem is only 'reported'...when there is a bugzilla entry for it. > Just posting problems to the beta list is a good way to have them fall > through the cracks. I could report bugs on my personal website blog as a > i find them...and have the same unreasonable expectation that a red hat > developer...the right red hat developer...would stumble on them there, > as they would on this beta list. Sometimes is nice to open up a bug for > general discussion, or sometimes even Elton's 'hey i posted my 1,211th > bugticket to bugzilla have a look' messages are worth glancing at. But > actually 'reporting' a problem to the right developer is done by > actually using a bugzilla ticket. How about you reference the > bugticket.....that is suppose to be in the system? > > -jef"its funny really...all this griping of expectation on what the new > communication with Red Hat was promised to look like...but we can't seem > to use the tools already in place to give feedback to the developers, > i'm not sure the red hat community is ready for responsibility that an > open development model would require"spaleta -- Féliciano Matias <feliciano matias free fr>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=