Re: Why xcdroast and not gcombust?

[Jos Vos <jos xos nl>]

On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 03:25:01PM -0500, Steve Bergman wrote:

> I was just wondering why xcdroast gets included as the standard cd
> writer and not gcombust.  I always end up frustrated with xcdroast and
> gcombust is quite friendly.  Also, it's obvious how to write an existing
> iso image with gcombust and I don't see that xcdroast can even do it. 

Yes, xcdroast can do this very easily.  Not very happy with then UI too,
but I have that with every *G*UI ;-), so I don't know if it is that bad.
Never looked at gcombust, I'm used to xcdroast and the command-line tools.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204