Re: opteron ?

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 18:19, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 15:28, James Ralston wrote:
> > It doesn't really make sense to take the effort to put AMD64 support
> > in Cambridge, for two reasons:
> >
> >     1.  The Opteron is AMD's server chip, and is thus best paired
> > with RHEL.
> 
> Ugh.. sounds like a marketing call on that one.  Guess we should strip 
> all the server stuff out of RHLP since it's all better suited for RHEL 
> anyway... 
> 
> *grumble*


I know some researchers in physics departments who would be interested
in burning some cycles on a rebuild.

Beowulf-node != server.

-sv