[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Version Numbering (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6.x in next RHL version.)
- From: Stephen Smoogen <smoogen lanl gov>
- To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Version Numbering (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6.x in next RHL version.)
- Date: 22 Jul 2003 11:07:48 -0600
I second and move it to a vote.
My vote is 00001010.
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 10:09, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote :
>
> > > You are correct, and this brings up another question... will the
> > > version number of the next Red Hat Linux remain secret as it has in the
> > > past, or will it be released as part of the newly-open schedule?
> >
> > The version number is currently slated to be '10'. That may change,
> > but I don't know of a reason why it would at the moment.
>
> Well, 10 is plain and expected, X is already taken, so I vote for 00001010
> or even better, 0xA :-)
>
> Matthias
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen lanl gov
Los Alamos National Labrador CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 (note new #)
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]