[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Version Numbering (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6.x in next RHL version.)



Throw me in as a vote for 0xA lol.

#-----Original Message-----
#From: rhl-beta-list-admin redhat com 
#[mailto:rhl-beta-list-admin redhat com] On Behalf Of Stephen Smoogen
#Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:08 PM
#To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
#Subject: Re: Version Numbering (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6.x in next 
#RHL version.)
#
#
#I second and move it to a vote.
#
#My vote is 00001010.
#
#
#On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 10:09, Matthias Saou wrote:
#> Bill Nottingham wrote :
#> 
#> > > You are correct, and this brings up another question... will the 
#> > > version number of the next Red Hat Linux remain secret as it has 
#> > > in the past, or will it be released as part of the newly-open 
#> > > schedule?
#> > 
#> > The version number is currently slated to be '10'. That 
#may change, 
#> > but I don't know of a reason why it would at the moment.
#> 
#> Well, 10 is plain and expected, X is already taken, so I vote for 
#> 00001010 or even better, 0xA :-)
#> 
#> Matthias
#-- 
#Stephen John Smoogen		smoogen lanl gov
#Los Alamos National Labrador  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 4-0645 
#(note new #) Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S  Los Alamos, NM 87545
#-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --
#
#
#--
#Rhl-beta-list mailing list
#Rhl-beta-list redhat com 
#http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-#beta-list
#




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]