[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Version Numbering (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6.x in next RHL version.)
- From: Bill Rhodes <wrhodes 27 org>
- To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
- Subject: RE: Version Numbering (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6.x in next RHL version.)
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
I'm inclined to agree. It'd be pretty clever. Although the PHB types
will get mighty confused when everyone else is up near version 15 or 16
and RHL is "only just" coming out with "version 10".
Of course RH could really get a jump on the competition and use octal.
-B
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Florian Hines wrote:
> Throw me in as a vote for 0xA lol.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]