[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Reason for the change
- From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh Klotz pahv xerox com>
- To: "'rhl-beta-list redhat com'" <rhl-beta-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: Reason for the change
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:21:50 -0700
I must say I'm following all this and trying to make sense of the various
levels of decisions and revisions, and motivations, and implications.
So I'm asking this in all sincerity: is RHL like Debian Unstable and RHEL
like Debian Stable?
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Cox [mailto:alan redhat com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:01 PM
To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
Subject: Re: Reason for the change
> > don't have to be worried about losing value in Red Hat Linux...
>
> If Red Hat Linux is absolutely stable doesn't that cut into revenues for
> RHEL?
There are different kinds of "stable". Enterprise customers react in
different ways
...
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]