Re: Reason for the change

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 16:59, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:21:50PM -0700, Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> > I must say I'm following all this and trying to make sense of the various
> > levels of decisions and revisions, and motivations, and implications.
> > So I'm asking this in all sincerity: is RHL like Debian Unstable and RHEL
> > like Debian Stable?
> > 
> 
> RHL has releases that go through a beta cycle, it's not a "rolling
> beta" like rawhide.

This is comforting to hear. I know a number of people, myself included,
who were worried about quality dropping w/edgier software than what is
now included - and of course the major-number versions change every 6
months alarmed people about compatibility, etc.


> Also, RHEL is not just RHL-plus-bugfixes, it does have additional
> features.

Like what?

-sv