[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Graphical boot isn't so graphical
- From: Anthony Joseph Seward <anthony seward ieee org>
- To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Graphical boot isn't so graphical
- Date: 23 Jul 2003 12:09:44 -0600
Just go to console 1 during the graphical boot. The text stuff is still
there.
Tony
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 11:39, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 00:29, Thomas Corriher wrote:
>
> > Benjamin Vander was correct. It is the graphical booting which is
> > more likely to cause boot problems, or allow serious problems to go
> > unnoticed during the boot process. It is a bad design decision
> > from a technical perspective. However, it is good marketing and
> > seems more welcoming to newbies. I guess it is all a matter of
> > priorities. I suppose as long as RH makes reconfiguring it
> > reasonably easy, then this is not a major problem for anyone.
> It's not too bad - if your system crashed, during the next boot sequence
> your partitions would not be cleanly unmounted and rhgb would not be
> triggered.
>
> Guess I'll have to start making it a habit of booting into runlevel 3
> after making changes, e.g. after adding services...
>
> Regards,
>
> Michel
>
>
> --
> Rhl-beta-list mailing list
> Rhl-beta-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
--
Anthony Joseph Seward <anthony seward ieee org>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]