[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: 2.6.0-test1 kernel? gcc 3.3 compiler?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Gilmore [mailto:dennis dgilmore net]
> Sent: Thu, July 24, 2003 3:59 PM
> To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
> Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1 kernel? gcc 3.3 compiler?
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Once upon a time at band camp Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:56 pm, 
> Gerald Henriksen 
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:09:14 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
> > >  at the risk of being perhaps a little too far out there
> > >on the bleeding edge, i'm thinking of dumping the 2.6.0-test1
> > >kernel on my severn system today, just to push the boundaries.
> >
> > I ran 2.6.0-test1 yesterday with only one noticeable 
> problem (couldn't
> > access cdrom) which I didn't have time to look into.
> 
> i actualy did have the cd issue one time i tried to access a 
> cd  modprobe 
> ide-cd fixed that

Same here, I had to add 'modprobe ide-cd' line to rc.modules file to make CD
work without manual interaction.

> Dennis
> 
> >
> > >  in addition, what are the implications of upgrading to
> > >gcc 3.3?  and what other RPMs would have to go along with
> > >that to have a usable system?
> >
> > The beta comes with gcc 3.3 as the default compiler (and gcc32 3.2.3
> > for the 2.4 kernel).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rhl-beta-list mailing list
> > Rhl-beta-list redhat com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE/H+Yu4hBQ1unFjm4RAjvXAJ9E/jdfJdteGXrZcsFHJdTzZoz7PQCgmiL0
> f2YeigSp6/rbMaoL0RmP/fY=
> =5wvp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> --
> Rhl-beta-list mailing list
> Rhl-beta-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]