[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Reiserfs (was: feature request)
- From: Dax Kelson <dax gurulabs com>
- To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
- Subject: Reiserfs (was: feature request)
- Date: 24 Jul 2003 17:04:21 -0600
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 16:46, Benjamin Vander Jagt wrote:
> Plus, I used to get a lot of power outages. Ext3 has, a few times, been
> totally destroyed (even fsck doesn't find data) where I have *never*
> lost *any* data to ReiserFS, even on two test hard drives that were
> loaded with bad sectors.
This sounds wrong. Reiserfs's bad block handling is an ACKNOWLEDGED
problem by NameSys.
http://namesys.com/bad-block-handling.html
When I last tried ReiserFS a year ago (things may have changed, yadda
yadda), I had a 20GB filesystem on a drive that developed "3" bad
sectors (of 512 bytes each).
After getting an image using dd_rescue, I ran reiserfsck on the image.
After reiserfsck finished 98% of the filesystem was completely and
utterly mangled.
Since I made a backup copy of the filesystem image before running fsck,
I painfully used a hexeditor to recover some important scripts that I
had written.
I won't use Reiserfs on a production box again until:
a) The bad block handling is fixed
b) The reiserfsck command becomes more robust
BTW, Reiserfs v4 looks interesting.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]