[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Feature Request
- From: "Ethan Bonick" <etbonick networkinggeeks com>
- To: <rhl-beta-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Feature Request
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:21:24 -0500 (CDT)
> Jeremy Portzer wrote:
>
>> But you have to be realistic about configuration tools. If you are
>> looking for a vast increase in the number of options, and thus the
>> complexity, of basic things like filesystems, there will be an
>> exponential increase in the codebase necessary for configuration
>> tools. There are only limited resources available. As linuxconf
>> demonstrated, you have to be REALLY good at writing configuration
>> tools, or you end up with a big mess.
>
> Have you looked at anaconda code? It _already_ contains code to handle
> the requested filesystems, unless it was recently ripped out. The GUI
> just hides that fact from the end user.
>
Why bother putting it in if you are going to hide it?
--
Ethan Bonick
etbonick_AT_networkinggeeks.com
http://www.networkinggeeks.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]