Le sam 26/07/2003 à 12:13, Eduardo Silva a écrit : > I've just installed the latest Severn Beta, and have noticed that the compile > kernel included in that distro kernel-2.4.21-20.1.2024.2.1.nptl doe snot have > reiserfs support included. As I have my /home partition in resiserfs it is a > problema install kernel-unsupported from severn. > for me. > > As a temp solution I have installed the 2.4.20-19.9 Redhat 9 kernel which is > compiled with reiserfs, and also installed the kernel source for the > 2.4.21-20 kernel to try to recompile reiserfs support. > > Is the fact that these new stock kernels from Redhat does not support reiserfs > a move from Redhat away from support of this fs type, or is this just a > product of being a beta kernel (also the rawhide kernel also does not have > reiserfs support)? > > Also, what is the best way to recompile the kernel using the kernel sources? > > I've tried: > > * copy configs/kernel-2.4.21-i686.config to .config > * This config to my surprise already has reiserfs module support (I thought > Redhat used this configs to do every kernel) As the severn kernel. > * then do a make rpm > > The make rpm is failing due to some modules compile, such as : > > make[4]: *** [libata.o] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.4.2120.1.2024.2.1.nptlcustom/drivers/scsi' > make[3]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > make[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.4.2120.1.2024.2.1.nptlcustom/drivers/scsi' > make[2]: *** [_subdir_scsi] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.4.2120.1.2024.2.1.nptlcustom/drivers' > make[1]: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.4.2120.1.2024.2.1.nptlcustom' > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56165 (%build) > > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56165 (%build) > make: *** [rpm] Error 1 > > By enabling and disabling certain drivers I can get around that issue (before > it was failing due to the I2C driver, disbled that in .config and now it's > this), but I wonder whether this is the best option, as I would presume that > Redhat's .config and kernel source should give no issue at all... > > Anyways, thanks a lot for any help, > > BR, -- Féliciano Matias <feliciano matias free fr>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=