[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Yum, autoupdate (was: Re: Graphical boot isn't so graphical)
- From: Michael Schwendt <ms-nospam-0306 arcor de>
- To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Yum, autoupdate (was: Re: Graphical boot isn't so graphical)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:51:49 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 24 Jul 2003 09:36:24 -0400, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> Feature comparison sticks aside...the fact that yum uses the python
> bindings of redhat's own rpm related applications, makes yum seem to me
> the absolutely obvious choice for further development inside rhl, in
> terms of future development integration.
>
> Want to give the installer or r-c-p the ability to talk to external
> repos as a matter of project goals on down the road? Yum seems to be the
> thing for that.
Does r-c-p still fail to install certain packages on a system which
has errata packages installed already? A network-capable backend in
r-c-p would be the only way to fix that (known) problem.
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/JooF0iMVcrivHFQRAhT5AKCAXzgidBWBTnj+avguUcQfjk6HHACeM4Rh
pf/2WMo+LlNtrgMa0zt9xaQ=
=Uj9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]