Re: kernel and gcc issues -- giving it one more shot

[Mike Chambers <mike netlyncs com>]

On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 12:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   
>   but is there any reason *not* to rebuild the kernel using gcc 3.3, in
> order to avoid any future mismatch issues? 

There are/were issues with the latest 2.4 kernels and gcc-3.3 and they
won't compile, so that is why 3.2 was/is used.  Not sure on the very
lastest as of today or if there is any sort of work around.

Maybe one of the kernel folks can comment on it.

-- 
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY

"Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege."