[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: bugs, bugs, bugs!
- From: Jack Bowling <jbinpg shaw ca>
- To: rhl-beta-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: bugs, bugs, bugs!
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:49:00 -0700
** Reply to message from Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> on Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:00:12 -0400
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2002-June/msg00041.html
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:30:10PM -0700, Jack Bowling wrote:
> > OK, I don't want to be overly argumentative here, but if the releases
> > are now short-cycle, just when will there be enough time to sweep the
> > bugs away and get to the RFEs?
>
> Keep in mind that the releases aren't necessarily any shorter-cycle
> than they've ever been, or shorter than GNOME or Mozilla for example.
>
> The releases are time-based though, that means once the feature freeze
> hits, all the RFEs are off the list until the next cycle.
>
> This post relating to GNOME is an explanation of how a time-based
> release works:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2002-June/msg00041.html
Thanks for the link. Havoc. Although the gist of it may just be enough to send some readers scuttling off to Enterprise and leave WS behind.
jb
--
Jack Bowling Prince George, BC mailto:jbinpg shaw ca
- References:
- bugs, bugs, bugs!
- Re: bugs, bugs, bugs!
- Re: bugs, bugs, bugs!
- Re: bugs, bugs, bugs!
- Re: bugs, bugs, bugs!
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]