[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Changes to named
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: "Neal D. Becker" <nbecker hns com>
- Cc: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Changes to named
- Date: 06 Nov 2003 00:20:22 -0200
On Nov 5, 2003, "Neal D. Becker" <nbecker hns com> wrote:
> I see in release notes that the permissions/ownerships of named files have
> changed. Is it OK to install (clean), then restore my
> backed-up /var/lib/named and /etc/named.conf, or will I have to change
> ownerships/permissions?
Err... Release Notes anyone?
o The BIND nameserver has had its security tightened. The /var/named/
directory is no longer owned by "named", but rather by "root". Slave
zone files should now be stored in the new /var/named/slaves/
directory, which is owned by "named". In addition, a new bind-chroot
package makes it possible to run the named daemon in a chroot() "jail"
(located in /var/named/chroot/) for greater security.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]