Re: 2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

James Morris (jmorris redhat com) said: 
> On Tue, 4 May 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:11:26AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Interesting - the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM option is not set in
> > > > the kernel configuration in the corresponding kernel SRPM, so the
> > > > selinux=0 support is disabled.
> > > 
> > > I don't know why this is disabled now.  Arjan?
> > 
> > isn't this obsoleted by the /etc/sysconfig/selinux thing in SysVinit ?
> 
> Yes.

What we used selinux= and enforcing= was for overriding the config
file if you screw it up. If there's another way around this, sure.

Bill