[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Gimp-print vs gutenprint
- From: Sean Bruno <sean bruno dsl-only net>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Gimp-print vs gutenprint
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:56:16 -0800
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:39 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Indeed it is not "released," but neither is OO.org2... But no worries,
> there's always FC5... :)
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:34 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:37:35AM -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >
> > > Was wondering if it is too late in the test cycle to suggest that
> > > gimp-print(v4.7) be replaced with gutenprint(v5.0 beta 3)?
> > >
> > > http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
> >
> > Gutenprint isn't even released yet!
> >
> > Tim.
> > */
> > --
> > fedora-test-list mailing list
> > fedora-test-list redhat com
> > To unsubscribe:
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
On a side note to this thread, I installed gutenprint on my FC4T1 box
and I experienced some strange cups behaviour. The Web Admin interface
allowed me to change the driver on my printer to the Gutenprint "driver"
but the printer-config util doesn't notice that I have installed these
"drivers"
Is this expected behavior, or is there something amiss here?
Sean
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]