Re: kernel 2.6.16-1.2107_FC5 breaks graphical boot (and cups and httpd)

["shrek-m gmx de" <shrek-m gmx de>]

On 05.05.2006 08:18, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 08:06 +0200, shrek-m gmx de wrote:
>  
>
> > > > I'm not trying to point fingers and/or throw mud.
> > > > My question is, will it be possible to find a mid-route, which combines
> > > > the shortest possible vulnerability period with a minimal risk of having
> > > > DOA machines?
> > > What do you think is the "mid-route" for time critical security fixes?
> > the mid-route seems to be that there are no longer  2107_FC5 kernels  in 
> > fc5 updates or updates-testing.
> >    
> My question wasn't specific to one particular issue. Obviously this
> time, it was a mess up that has been fixed now.

fixed by removing a released/published package in updates ?
sorry.

where is your problem?

-- fedora / redhat internals
==>  updates-testing + announcement
--  public testing,  (hours, days, weeks)
==>  updates + announcement
--  published update


i see no reason why a security update should take a shorter way.

--
shrek-m