Le mar 09/12/2003 à 23:04, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Telsa Gwynne wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:45:23PM +0100 or thereabouts, Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:31:42AM -0600, Jens Knutson wrote: > > > > > I'm pretty sure it's not using this now b/c Bitstream vera doesn't > > > > > support all the characters necessary for display of a significant number > > > > > of latin languages. > > > > > > > > Can anyone from RH verify? Is this true? > > > It is true at least for Czech and Slovak. > > > Mirek > > > > And Welsh. Although something tells me it's not the same letters > > involved :) > > > > Telsa > > Perhpahs they can be added? So far people have been more interested in playing with Vera metrics than adding new glyphs. Drawing new glyphs is hard. > Is the license problem with > Bitstream Vera fonts resolved? I assume so as they are included. > What are the minimum blocks that should be covered? Just latin? > Greek? Cyrrilic? W4GL I think, like for the corefonts. Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=