Re: FC2, 2.6 vs 2.4

[Alan Cox <alan redhat com>]

> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 07:02, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> 
> > The problem with ide-scsi is that it's needed for tapes.
> > Burning is easy.
> 
> It's my current understanding that ide-tape is less broken than
> ide-scsi. (Although it too needs fixing iirc).

ide-tape only handles some kinds of tape drive. You still need ide-scsi